 |
Introduction |
The
launch of the first selective 5-hydroxytryptamine
(5-HT)1B/1D receptor agonist sumatriptan
(Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
) in the early 1990s has been hailed as the
most significant advance in the acute treatment of migraine since the
introduction of dihydroergotamine (DHE) more than 50 years ago.
Sumatriptan therefore represented a major new therapeutic principle in
migraine, selectively activating 5-HT1B/1D
receptor subtypes (previously 5-HT1-like;
Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
). Although the precise mechanism by which
sumatriptan alleviates migraine is still not fully elucidated, three
distinct pharmacological actions on the vasculature and neurons have
been invoked to explain its antimigraine effect. Vasoconstriction of cranial blood vessels (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
; Ferrari and Saxena,
1993
), inhibition of neurogenic inflammation involving reduced
vasodilator sensory neuropeptide release from peripheral (dural)
trigeminal nerve terminals (Moskowitz, 1992
) and/or inhibition of
firing of trigeminal neurons (Hoskin et al., 1996
) have been proposed.
Sumatriptan is an effective acute treatment for migraine (Ferrari,
1998
), but it has major limitations: low oral bioavailability (see
Goadsby, 1998b
), fewer than half of the patients who are treated are
pain free at 2 h after drug administration, and about one third of
responders experience headache recurrence within 24 to 48 h
(Ferrari, 1998
). The room for improvement over the clinical
effectiveness of sumatriptan is therefore substantial. Thus, newer
agents, all of which are tryptamine derivatives, including naratriptan,
rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan, have improved oral bioavailabilities
(40-74%; Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby, 1998b
) but apparently have not
superseded sumatriptan in terms of therapeutic effectiveness according
to initial reports (Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby, 1998a
, b
). Indeed, a
limited therapeutic response ("ceiling effect") to this class of
agents in aborting a migraine attack is currently being unveiled
(Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby, 1998a
, b
).
The rationale for our chemical approach was to take advantage of the
superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT compared with
tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors because we
hypothesized that the magnitude of the intrinsic activity that is
produced at 5-HT1B/1D receptors by selective
agonists is a key determinant of therapeutic antimigraine
effectiveness. Most, if not all, of the selective
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists derived from
tryptamine that have been described to date, including sumatriptan,
naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and eletriptan, behave as
partial agonists with respect to the endogenous agonist 5-HT (Connor et
al., 1997
; Martin et al., 1997
; Pauwels et al., 1997
; Willems et al.,
1998
). Moreover, it might be considered, on theoretical grounds, that the relatively low intrinsic activity of the currently available 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists might limit their
therapeutic effectiveness in alleviating migraine. In principle, a
high-efficacy agonist will have the advantage over a lower efficacy
agonist (i.e., a partial agonist) in producing full responses whatever
the extent of receptor reserve in the tissue or organ in question
(Kenakin, 1993
). Thus, and in contrast to a partial agonist, a
high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist can be
expected to elicit large amplitude responses throughout the entire
peripheral and central trigeminovascular system where
5-HT1B/1D receptors are located. The outcome of
our research effort is F 11356 (Perez et al., 1995
; Fig.
1), which is presently shown to exert
potent and selective actions, and exceptionally high efficacy at
5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors
both in vitro and in vivo in models relevant to the vascular and
neurogenic hypotheses in migraine. Because F 11356 is orally active,
has a long duration of action, gains access to the brain, and is well tolerated in animals, the drug is endowed with the potential to provide
acute therapeutic relief from migraine headache, which is superior to
that offered by currently available treatments.

View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Chemical structure of F 11356, a novel arylpiperazide
derivative of serotonin. For details of chemical synthesis, see Perez
et al. (1995) .
|
|
 |
Materials and Methods |
All experiments were carried out in accordance with the European
Communities Counsel Directive of November 24, 1986 (86/609/EEC), and
the National Institutes of Health "Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals" (NIH publication no. 85-23, revised 1985) and
were approved by the local ethics committee.
Receptor-Binding Assays.
F 11356 and other ligands were
examined in vitro using membrane preparations from brain tissue or
mammalian cell lines expressing recombinant 5-HT receptors.
Radioligand-binding studies were performed as previously described in
cell lines that had been transfected with the following receptors or
gene products: human (h) 5-HT1A (HeLa/HA7:
Pauwels and Palmier, 1995
), h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D (Cos-7: Pauwels et al., 1995
; C6 rat
glioma: Pauwels et al., 1996
, 1997
; Wurch et al., 1997b
), rabbit
5-HT1B (Cos-7: Wurch et al., 1997b
), rat
5-HT1B (Cos-7: Pleus and Bylund, 1992
), guinea
pig 5-HT1B (C6 rat glioma: Pauwels et al.,
1998b
), rat and guinea pig 5-HT1D (Cos-7: Wurch
et al., 1997a
), h 5-HT1E and h
5-HT1F (Cos-7: Pauwels et al. 1997
), h
5-HT2A (HEK 293: Leysen et al., 1982
), h
5-HT5A (Cos-7: Rees et al., 1994
), h
5-HT6 (Cos-7: Monsma et al., 1993
), h
5-HT7 (Cos-7: To et al., 1995
), and rat
5-HT7 (Cos-7: Shen et al., 1993
).
Radioligand-binding studies were performed as previously described in
the brain area indicated on the following native receptors: rat
5-HT1A (hippocampus: Pauwels and Palmier, 1994
),
ovine 5-HT1B/1D (caudate nucleus: Pauwels et al.,
1993
), rat 5-HT2A (frontal cortex: Kleven et al.,
1997
), and guinea pig 5-HT4 (caudate nucleus:
Grossman et al., 1993
). Finally, murine 5-HT3
receptor binding studied was performed in the hybrid NG 108 CC 15 cell
line, as described by Neijt et al. (1988)
. Compounds were studied at
concentrations ranging from 0.01 nM to 10 µM, using Whatman GF/B
filters to terminate incubation.
Inhibition of Forskolin-Induced Cyclic AMP (cAMP) Formation.
Inhibition of forskolin (100 µM)-induced cAMP formation in C6 glioma
cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B, h
5-HT1D, or h 5-HT1A receptors, respectively, by F 11356 and other ligands was investigated as described previously (Pauwels et al. 1996
).
Stimulation of Specific
[35S]Guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate
(GTP
S) Radioligand Binding.
[35S]GTP
S specific binding was determined in
the presence or absence of F 11356 and other ligands in C6 glioma cell
membranes stably expressing h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptors, as described previously
(Pauwels et al. 1997
). Maximal stimulation of specific [35S]GTP
S binding was expressed as a
percentage of the response obtained with 10 µM 5-HT.
Contractile Responses in Rabbit Isolated Saphenous Vein.
Rabbit isolated saphenous vein rings with intact endothelium were
prepared for isometric tension recording, as previously described
(Valentin et al., 1996
), in the presence of
N
-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester (L-NAME, 10 µM) to inhibit
endothelial NO synthase. Cumulative concentration-effect curves were
determined for F 11356, 5-HT, sumatriptan, and naratriptan in either
the presence or absence of the mixed 5-HT1B/1D
receptor antagonist GR 127935 (Clitherow et al., 1994
).
Stimulation of Outward K+ Current in Guinea Pig
Isolated Trigeminal Ganglion Cells.
Guinea pig trigeminal ganglion
cells were isolated from right and left ganglia as described by Liu and
Simon (1994)
and were cultured for 12 to 18 h at 37°C in 5%
CO2 in a Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% heat-inactivated DCS. Outward K+
currents were studied as described previously (Le Grand et al., 1998a
)
in trigeminal ganglion cells using the patch-clamp technique in the
whole-cell configuration. Cumulative concentration-effect curves were
obtained for F 11356 and sumatriptan, with each concentration being
applied for 3 min. Steady-state outward currents
(IKss) were measured at the end of a
3-s test pulse (stimulation frequency = 0.05 Hz) relative to the
current before the beginning of the test pulse. Experiments were
repeated in either the presence or absence of GR 127935 (0.1 µM).
Hypothermia in Guinea Pigs.
Rectal temperature was measured
to the nearest 0.1°C in male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (300-400 g;
Charles River, France) as described by Skingle et al. (1994)
.
Temperature measurements were taken immediately before the oral
administration of F 11356 and other compounds, and at 15 and 30 min and
1, 2, 4, and 8 h after drug or vehicle administration. Drugs were
administered in 1% methyl cellulose in distilled water.
Potency to induce hypothermia (ED50 values) was
determined as the dose producing a significant reduction of rectal
temperature (
38.2°C) in 50% of the animals. Temperatures of
38.2°C were considered to be significantly reduced because in
preliminary experiments, values of
38.2°C occurred only in 1 of 230 (0.4%) control animals. Also, baseline body temperature was
38.4-39.1°C in all animals in the present study.
Carotid Hemodynamics in Anesthetized Pigs.
Male Landrace
pigs (19-25 kg; M. Gaec, Soreze, France) were anesthetized with
azaperone (3 mg/kg i.m.) followed by sodium pentobarbital (25 mg/kg
i.v. bolus and 10-20 mg/kg/h infusion) and then intubated and
artificially ventilated (Alpha100, Minerve, Esternay, France) with a
mixture of room air and oxygen (0.5-1 liter/min). Blood gases and
arterial pressure were maintained within physiological limits. Heparin
(500 IU/kg i.v.) was also administered. Before thoracotomy, catheters
were placed in the inferior vena cava via the left saphenous vein for
drug/vehicle administration and in the right saphenous vein for
anesthesia. Femoral arteries were cannulated (7F; Vygon, Ecouen,
France) for aortic blood pressure measurements (Statham P10EZ
transducers) or for arterial blood gas determinations (ABL-510;
Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Blood flow was measured in
left and right common carotid arteries and left anterior descending
coronary artery by means of appropriately sized flow probes connected
to a pulsed Doppler flow amplifier (VF1; Crystal Biotech, Northboro, MA). Body temperature was maintained at 37-38°C (by means of
a thermostated insulating blanket), and sterile saline was infused i.v.
throughout the experiment to compensate fluid loss (0.5-1 liter total
volume). Parameters were digitized and analyzed on line by computer
using interactive software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech). Calculated
parameters were as follows: total carotid vascular resistance was
derived from mean arterial pressure divided by total carotid blood
flow, and coronary vascular resistance was derived from coronary
perfusion pressure divided by left anterior descending coronary blood
flow. Coronary perfusion pressure was determined as the difference
between diastolic aortic pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
After a 30-min stabilization period, animals received an i.v. infusion
of either vehicle [40% polyethylene glycol 300 in sterile saline
(n = 9) or sterile saline (n = 10) in
52.5 ml over 105 min] or cumulative doses of F 11356 (0.01, 0.04, 0.16, 0.63, 2.5, 10, and 40 µg/kg i.v. in 7.5 ml/15 min/dose,
n = 7) or sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, or
zolmitriptan (0.63, 2.5, 10, 40, 160, 630, and 2500 µg/kg i.v. in 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7). Note lower doses of F 11356 used due to higher potency of the drug. Parameters were measured up to
60 min after infusion of the highest dose of drug (or vehicle
equivalent) was stopped for assessment of response recovery. In
separate experiments, pigs received an i.v. infusion of GR 127935 (0.63 mg/kg, n = 6) or its vehicle (n = 7),
followed 15 min later by F 11356 (0.01-40 µg/kg i.v., as above; 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7) or its vehicle
(n = 6).
Oral Activity in Conscious Dogs.
Four male beagle dogs
(18-25 kg; CEDS, Toucy, France) were sedated with a mixture of
fentanyl and fluanizone (Hypnorm, 0.1 ml/kg i.m.), received atropine
(0.02 mg/kg i.m.), and were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital
(20-25 mg/kg i.v.). After intubation, anesthesia was maintained under
artificial ventilation with isoflurane (1-2%) in oxygen (2-4
liters/min) and room air (5-6 liters/min). Under sterile conditions, a
ventral neck incision was made, the left carotid artery was isolated,
and an appropriately sized pulsed Doppler flow probe (2.8-3.2 mm;
Crystal Biotech) was placed around the vessel and secured.
Cables were externalized under the neck skin between the scapulae, in
an anchor button system (Bioseb, Chaville, France), to maintain
sterility. After surgery, each dog was treated with buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg s.c.) and penicillin-procaine (Duphaphen-LA; 0.2 ml/kg i.m.) for
3 days for analgesic and antibiotic coverage, respectively. During the
postoperative period, dogs were trained to lie quietly in a cage.
Experiments were conducted 2 to 3 weeks after surgery, and external
wires were protected by a nylon vest (Phymep, Paris, France) that the
dogs had previously been trained to wear. The four-limb
electrocardiogram was derived from lead II and was used for
computerized calculation of heart rate. Carotid blood flow and
electrocardiographic signals were digitized and recorded on line using
interactive software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech).
The effects of orally administered drugs (F 11356, sumatriptan,
naratriptan, or zolmitriptan) or placebo (gelatin capsules, 44000 KS,
Capsugel) on carotid flow, electrocardiography, and behavior were
observed continuously for the first 4 h and then at 6- and 12-h
intervals after drug or placebo administration. For each experiment,
each animal received only one dose of a particular drug, and a washout
period of 7 days was observed between experiments.
In Vivo Receptor Selectivity Studies.
Behavioral studies
were performed in rats in which lower-lip retraction, flat body
posture, and forepaw treading were quantified as described previously
(Kleven et al., 1995
; n = 6 rats/group).
Further Cardiovascular Studies.
Studies of contractile
responses in canine isolated coronary arteries were performed as
described previously (Valentin et al., 1998
). Effects in isolated,
Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts were assessed as described by Le
Grand et al. (1998b)
. Effects on action potentials recorded in isolated
guinea pig papillary muscle were evaluated as described by Le Grand et
al. (1995)
.
Data Analysis.
Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M.
Concentration- and dose-response curves were fitted using the Marquardt
algorithm by means of appropriate software (Origin; Microcal,
Northhampton, MA), which gave geometric
EC50 or ED50 values with
95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed on
absolute values by ANOVA with or without repeated measurements followed
by the Dunnett's post hoc test, as appropriate (Sigmastat; Jandel
GmbH, Erkrath, Germany; or Statview; Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley,
CA), unless stated otherwise. p < .05 was considered
statistically significant.
Drugs and Vehicles.
F 11356 hydrochloride, sumatriptan
hydrochloride, rizatriptan hemisulfate, zolmitriptan base, naratriptan
base, GR 127935 dihydrochloride, and (+)-flesinoxan hydrochloride were
synthesized by the Divisions of Medicinal Chemistry IV and Analytical
Chemistry at the Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre.
All other agents used, including 5-HT, creatinine sulfate, ketanserin
tartrate, idazoxan hydrochloride, DHE mesylate, prazosin hydrochloride,
indomethacin, and L-NAME were purchased commercially (RBI,
Natick, MA; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; and Tocris Cookson,
Bristol, UK).
For in vitro experiments, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, GR 127935, 5-HT,
5-carboxamidotryptamine, prazosin, indomethacin, idazoxan, L-NAME, (+)-flesinoxan, and DHE were dissolved in
distilled water, whereas naratriptan, zolmitriptan, and F 11356 were
dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide such that the final bath concentration
did not exceed 0.1%. For in vivo studies, drugs were weighed as base, taking into account the salt-to-base ratio. Sumatriptan and rizatriptan were dissolved in sterile saline, whereas F 11356, zolmitriptan, and
naratriptan were dissolved in polyethylene glycol (40%) in sterile saline.
 |
Results |
Affinity, Potency, Efficacy, and Selectivity of F 11356 at Human
and Nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D Receptors.
F 11356 had subnanomolar affinity for cloned human, guinea pig, rabbit,
and rat 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D
receptors, with pKi values ranging
from 9.3 to 10.3 (Table 1). F 11356 had
50 times less binding affinity for the human and rat
5-HT1A receptor
(pKi = 7.6-7.8; Table 1) and low
affinity for other 5-HT receptor subtypes, including the h
5-HT1F-binding site (Table 1). Thus, F 11356 had
high affinity at and high selectivity for 5-HT1B
and 5-HT1D receptors. F 11356 did not distinguish
between 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, possessing equivalent affinity at these sites (Table 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
In vitro 5-HT receptor binding profile of F 11356
Radioligand binding experiments were performed as described in the
text.
|
|
The potency of F 11356 was compared with that of 5-HT,
tryptamine, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, naratriptan,
rizatriptan, and DHE in inhibiting forskolin-induced cAMP
accumulation and enhancement of specific
[35S]GTP
S binding in C6 glioma cells stably
transfected with h 5-HT1B or h
5-HT1D receptor genes. As shown in Table
2, F 11356 was the most potent compound
in inhibiting cAMP accumulation mediated by h
5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D
receptors and was notably more potent than 5-HT; only zolmitriptan was
equipotent to F 11356 in mediating h 5-HT1D
responses. No significant differences were observed in maximal
responses evoked by the agonists (data not shown; see also Pauwels et
al., 1997
). The inhibition by F 11356 of forskolin-induced cAMP
accumulation was insurmountably antagonized by the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (0.01-1
µM) in C6 glioma cells expressing h 5-HT1B
receptors, with responses being abolished by 0.1 µM GR 127935 (data
not shown). In C6 glioma cells expressing h
5-HT1D receptors, F 11356-mediated inhibition of
forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was competitively and
concentration-dependently antagonized by the mixed
5-HT2A/2C/1D receptor antagonist ketanserin (0.1-10 µM; Pauwels et al., 1995
) with a pA2
value of 7.01 and a slope of 0.81 as determined by Schild analysis.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP formation and enhancement of
specific [35S]GTP S binding in membranes of C6 glioma cells
stably expressing h 5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D receptors
Inhibition of forskolin (100 µM)-induced cAMP accumulation and
enhancement of specific [35S]GTP S binding was determined
as described in the text. pD2 values correspond to the negative
logarithm of the geometric drug concentration that produces 50% of its
maximal response and are expressed with 95% CI. pD2 app.
corresponds to apparent pD2 values. n corresponds to
the number of independent experiments. N.D., not determined.
|
|
Similarly, F 11356 was more potent than 5-HT, tryptamine, and the
tryptamine derivatives studied in enhancing specific
[35S]GTP
S binding via h
5-HT1B and h5-HT1D
receptors, and was equipotent to DHE (Table 2). A major finding of
these studies is that F 11356 stimulated specific
[35S]GTP
S binding with greater potency but
with similar efficacy compared with the endogenous agonist 5-HT (Fig.
2) at both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors. Among the tryptamine
derivatives investigated, only zolmitriptan and sumatriptan approached
the efficacy of 5-HT or F 11356 at the h 5-HT1B
but not at the h 5-HT1D receptor (Fig. 2).
Tryptamine produced maximum enhancement of specific
[35S]GTP
S binding at h
5-HT1B receptors of only 56 ± 5.5%
(n = 3). Rizatriptan, DHE, and naratriptan exhibited
relative efficacy at h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptors higher than tryptamine but lower
than all other compounds shown in Fig. 2.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Maximal enhancement of specific
[35S]GTP S binding in C6 glioma cells stably expressing
h 5-HT1B (top) and 5-HT1D receptors (bottom),
as described by Pauwels et al. (1997) . F 11356 produced equivalent
maximum responses (Emax) to 5-HT at both
receptors, which was not the case for the other drugs investigated.
Data were normalized to 5-HT = 100% enhancement of specific
[35S]GTP S binding. For relative potencies, refer to
Table 2. Data are mean ± S.E.M. *p < .01 versus 5-HT (Mann-Whitney U test). Data for sumatriptan,
zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, and DHE are from Pauwels et al.
(1997) .
|
|
In C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1A
receptors, F 11356 inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP formation with a
pD2 value of 5.94 (0.12; n = 3)
compared with 9.61 (0.17, n = 2) for DHE, 5.36 (0.19;
n = 2) for zolmitriptan, 5.61 (0.17; n = 2) for naratriptan, and <5 (n = 2) for
sumatriptan and rizatriptan, respectively.
Collectively, the data indicated that F 11356 had high affinity,
efficacy, and selectivity at recombinant 5-HT1B
and 5-HT1D receptors from a number of species.
In Vitro Vascular and Neuronal Actions of F 11356.
In isolated
rabbit saphenous vein rings prepared for isometric tension recording as
described previously (Valentin et al., 1996
), F 11356 was equipotent to
5-HT and more potent than naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and
sumatriptan in producing contractile responses (Table
3). Furthermore, like
naratriptan, F 11356, produced equivalent maximal responses to 5-HT,
whereas superior maximal responses compared with 5-HT were elicited by
sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan. Contractile responses
evoked by F 11356 were antagonized by GR 127935 in a noncompetitive
manner, with a pIC50 value of 9.3 (8.6-10.1),
and were abolished by 0.1 µM.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4
Baseline values of hemodynamic parameters in anesthetized pigs
Values are mean ± S.E.M. after 30-min stabilization and before
drug/vehicle administration. n, indicates number of animals.
No statistically significant differences were observed between groups
for mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or coronary vascular
resistance.
|
|
In isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion neurons, outward
K+ currents were recorded by the patch-clamp
technique in the whole-cell configuration. As shown in Fig.
3A, F 11356 was more potent and, more
importantly, produced a greater magnitude of response than sumatriptan
in stimulating outward K+ current
[pD2 = 7.3 (6.9-8.1) and 6.7 (6.5-6.9) for F
11356 and sumatriptan, respectively]. The stimulatory effect of F
11356, as well as that of sumatriptan, was abolished by GR 127935 (0.1 µM; Fig. 3B). Moreover, the selective 5-HT1A
receptor agonist (+)-flesinoxan (1 µM) failed to evoke any increase
in K+ current (maximum change,
4.3 ± 0.8%; p = NS compared with vehicle; data not shown).
When the calcium ion chelator EGTA (5 mM) was included in the patch
pipette, F 11356 (1 µM) produced no increase in outward
K+ current (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, increases in outward steady-state (ss)
hyperpolarizing K+ current (IK) evoked by F
11356 ( ) and sumatriptan ( ) in isolated guinea pig trigeminal
ganglion cells. Note greater potency and amplitude of responses
elicited by F 11356. *p < .05 compared with
sumatriptan (ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Student's
t test). B, maximum increases in
IKss evoked by F 11356 and sumatriptan in the
presence or absence of GR 127935 (0.1 µM) or EGTA (5 mM).
*p < .05 compared with vehicle controls (ANOVA
with repeated measures followed by Student's t test).
Data are mean ± S.E.M. See Materials and Methods
for further details.
|
|
Thus, in the isolated rabbit saphenous vein and in isolated guinea pig
trigeminal ganglion neurons, F 11356 behaves as a potent, high-efficacy
agonist at native 5-HT1B/1D receptors.
In Vivo Activity of F 11356 at Carotid Arterial
5-HT1B/1D Receptors.
Baseline values of hemodynamic
parameters in anesthetized pigs are shown in Table
4. F 11356, administered as cumulative i.v. infusions to anesthetized pigs, induced a pronounced, dose-related reduction in total carotid blood flow [ED50 = 0.53 (0.42-0.67) µg/kg i.v.]. F 11356 simultaneously evoked large
magnitude increases in total carotid vascular resistance (Fig.
4A). Mean systemic arterial pressure was
increased by F 11356 only at the dose of 10 µg/kg (maximum change,
17 ± 5%, p < .05 compared with vehicle, Fig.
4A). Sumatriptan failed to significantly decrease total carotid blood
flow or to affect mean arterial pressure (p = NS) and
produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of increases in total
carotid vascular resistance (Fig. 4B). Naratriptan significantly
reduced total carotid blood flow only at the dose of 40 µg/kg
(p < .05 compared with vehicle) and, like sumatriptan,
produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of increases in total
carotid vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure (Fig. 4C).
Zolmitriptan and rizatriptan dose-dependently and moderately reduced
total carotid blood flow [ED50 = 5.6 (2.8-11.2)
and 19.8 (6.8-57.0), respectively]. Although zolmitriptan produced
dose-dependent, moderate increases in total carotid vascular resistance
(Fig. 4D), rizatriptan significantly (p < .05)
increased total carotid vascular resistance at 40 µg/kg but not at
other doses (Fig. 4E). Zolmitriptan produced slight increases in mean
arterial pressure at 10 and 40 µg/kg (Fig. 4D), whereas rizatriptan
was without effect (Fig. 4E). Near-maximal reductions in total carotid
blood flow (
48 ± 4%; p < .05 compared with
vehicle) and increased total carotid vascular resistance (99 ± 8%; p < .05 compared with vehicle) with F 11356 were
only slowly reversible, being maintained for at least 60 min after the
infusion of F 11356 was stopped (Fig. 5).
As illustrated in Fig. 5, increases in total carotid vascular
resistance had returned to near-control values 60 min after the
infusion of sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan was
stopped, which is in contrast to that observed with F 11356. The drugs
and vehicle investigated had no significant effects on heart rate or
coronary vascular resistance (data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Comparison of increases in total carotid vascular
resistance ( ) and mean arterial pressure ( ) elicited by F 11356 (A), sumatriptan (B), naratriptan (C), zolmitriptan (D), and
rizatriptan (E) in anesthetized pigs. Note different abscissa in A
(greater potency of F 11356) and bell-shaped dose-response curve in B
and C. *p < .05 compared with vehicle (ANOVA with
repeated measures followed by Dunnett's test).
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of F 11356, naratriptan, zolmitriptan,
sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and corresponding vehicles on total carotid
vascular resistance in anesthetized pigs 60 min after drug/vehicle
infusion was stopped. Increases in total carotid vascular resistance
remained at near-maximal values 60 min after F 11356 infusion was
stopped. Data are mean ± S.E.M. *p < .05 compared with corresponding vehicle controls (one-way ANOVA with
repeated measures followed by Dunnett's test).
|
|
In an additional series of experiments in animals pretreated with GR
127935 (0.63 mg/kg, n = 5), F 11356-induced increases in total carotid vascular resistance (+132 ± 10%,
p < .05) and decreases in total carotid blood flow
(
50 ± 3%, p < .05) were abolished (+26 ± 11%, p = NS; and
15 ± 6%,
p = NS, respectively, compared with GR 127935 alone).
GR 127935 per se weakly increased carotid vascular resistance (maximum
change, +34 ± 18% compared with +4 ± 7% in the vehicle
group, p < .05) and tended to reduce total carotid
blood flow (maximum change,
20 ± 10% compared with +3 ± 4% in the vehicle-group, p = NS).
In conscious dogs, baseline heart rate and mean left carotid blood flow
values before drug/placebo administration were similar in all groups
(Table 5). Orally administered F 11356 dose-dependently reduced carotid
blood flow from 0.63 mg/kg (n = 3) without
significantly affecting heart rate (Fig.
6). F 11356 (0.16 mg/kg,
n = 4) failed to significantly affect carotid blood
flow or heart rate (data not shown). Decreases in carotid blood flow
evoked by F 11356 were long lasting, remaining significantly reduced
12 h after the administration at 2.5 mg/kg p.o. (n = 4; Fig. 6A). As shown in Fig. 6A, decreases in carotid blood flow
were noticeable within 30 min after F 11356 administration.
Furthermore, F 11356 failed to produce clinical signs over 48 h
after administration. Sumatriptan (2.5 and 10 mg/kg, n = 4 and 3, respectively) and naratriptan and zolmitriptan (both at 0.16 mg/kg, n = 4 in each case, and 0.63 mg/kg,
n = 4 and 3, respectively) failed to significantly reduce carotid blood flow (data not shown). Prominent clinical signs
were observed in each animal after 2.5 mg/kg sumatriptan and 0.63 mg/kg
naratriptan and zolmitriptan and included mydriasis, exophthalmos,
vocalization, restlessness, tachycardia, apprehension, and increased
respiratory rate. These clinical signs were observed for up to 12 h after drug administration. Placebo had no significant effects on
carotid blood flow, heart rate, or clinical signs (Fig. 6).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of orally administered F 11356 (0.63 mg/kg,
, and 2.5 mg/kg, ) and placebo (empty gelatin capsules, ) on
unilateral carotid blood flow (A) and heart rate (B) in conscious dogs.
Data are mean ± S.E.M. Dose-dependent and long-lasting (more than
12 h at 2.5 mg/kg) reductions in carotid blood flow were observed
with F 11356 in the absence of changes in heart rate, behavior, or
clinical signs. At this dose, maximum values were attained 30 min after
F 11356 administration. *p < .05 compared with
placebo (one-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's
test).
|
|
Hypothermia in Guinea Pigs.
Orally administered F 11356 evoked
hypothermic responses in guinea pigs and was found to be more potent
than sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and DHE
(Table 6). Relatively high doses (up to
40 mg/kg) of sumatriptan and DHE failed to produce hypothermic
responses of sufficient magnitude to determine
ED50 values.
In Vivo Receptor Selectivity of F 11356.
The in vitro
procedures described earlier indicated that F 11356 had affinity for
5-HT1A receptors that is 50-fold lower than that
for 5-HT1B/1D receptors. In rats, characteristic
behavioral effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists
such as lower-lip retraction, flat body posture, or forepaw treading
(Kleven et al., 1995
) were not observed after a high dose of F 11356 (40 mg/kg p.o.; data not given).
Collectively, the data suggest that the high-potency, -efficacy, and
-selectivity characteristics of F 11356 observed in vitro are also
manifested in vivo.
Further Cardiovascular Studies.
The studies performed in
anesthetized pigs and conscious dogs described earlier demonstrate that
F 11356, at the pharmacological doses investigated, is devoid of any
major hemodynamic side effects. The following studies have been carried
out to extend its cardiovascular profile: Contractile responses evoked
by F 11356 were compared with those of DHE, naratriptan, and
sumatriptan in the canine isolated coronary artery as described
previously (Valentin et al., 1998
; n = 15-17
rings/group) in the absence of endothelium. All four agonists
contracted coronary arteries, with a rank order of potency
(pD2 values) of DHE [6.9 (5.3-7.9)]
naratriptan [6.8 (5.7-7.3)]
F 11356 [6.7 (5.7-7.3)] > sumatriptan [4.8 (3.6-5.6)]. Rank order of intrinsic activity
(Emax ± S.E.M.) was sumatriptan (2.5 ± 0.6 mN) > naratriptan (1.7 ± 0.6 mN) > F
11356 (1.0 ± 0.4 mN) > DHE (0.6 ± 0.2 mN). No
significant differences were noted between
Emax values. However,
Emax values produced by all four drugs
were substantially lower than those evoked by an approximate EC50 concentration (10 nM) of the thromboxane
A2 analog U 46619 (27.5 ± 3.9 mN),
indicating relatively weak contractile responses induced by F 11356, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and DHE.
In isolated perfused guinea pig hearts, in the presence of endothelial
dysfunction and raised coronary vascular resistance induced by nitric
oxide synthase inhibition with L-NAME (10 µM), sumatriptan concentration-dependently [pD2 = 5.4 (5.2-5.5)] induced transient diastolic contracture via a mechanism
not involving 5-HT1B/1D receptors (Le Grand et
al., 1998b
). Under identical conditions, DHE or zolmitriptan (both 32 µM) failed to evoke diastolic contracture (Le Grand et al., 1998b
).
Similar to DHE and zolmitriptan, a high concentration of F 11356 (32 µM) also failed to induce diastolic contracture (data not shown).
In action potentials recorded via the conventional intracellular
microelectrode technique (Le Grand et al., 1995
) in isolated guinea pig
papillary muscles driven at 1 Hz, F 11356 (0.001-10 µM;
n = 8) failed to significantly affect resting potential
(
91.7 ± 1.05 versus
91.4 ± 0.6 mV), action potential
amplitude (127.0 ± 1.5 versus 127.4 ± 1.4 mV), maximal
upstroke velocity (155.2 ± 9.4 versus 147.9 ± 8.1 V/s), or
action potential duration at 90% repolarization (208.2 ± 6.0 versus 208.8 ± 4.0 ms), indicating that on the basis of these
data, F 11356 appears to be devoid of arrhythmogenic potential.
 |
Discussion |
F 11356 is a novel arylpiperazide 5-HT derivative that has been
designed to take advantage of the superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT compared with tryptamine at
5-HT1B/1D receptors. Indeed, the most striking
feature of the pharmacological profile of F 11356, besides high potency
and selectivity, is the uniquely high level of intrinsic activity
exerted by the compound at 5-HT1B/1D receptors.
Radioligand Binding and Cellular Assays.
F 11356 has
subnanomolar affinity for recombinant human and nonhuman
5-HT1B and 5-HT1D
receptors, does not distinguish between the two subtypes, and displays
high selectivity over other 5-HT-binding sites, including
5-HT1F sites. F 11356 has low or no detectable affinity for a number of major neurotransmitter, autacoid, ion channel,
or reuptake binding sites (unpublished observations). Moderate
(submicromolar) affinity was shown for F 11356 at
5-HT1A receptors, and the intact cell cAMP assay
yielded similarly weak 5-HT1A receptor agonist
activity for F 11356. The radioligand-binding profile of F 11356 is one
of a high-affinity, high-selectivity 5-HT1B/1D
receptor ligand.
F 11356 was the most potent inhibitor of cAMP accumulation in C6 glioma
cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B or h
5-HT1D receptors, although zolmitriptan was
equipotent to F 11356 at h 5-HT1D receptors. Similarly, F 11356 was also more potent than tryptamine and its derivatives, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan, in enhancing specific [35S]GTP
S binding in
C6 glioma cell membranes expressing h 5-HT1B and
h 5-HT1D receptors. DHE was equipotent to F 11356 in enhancing specific [35S]GTP
S binding in
both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D
systems. A striking finding in the latter study was the apparent
difference in maximal responses obtained with F 11356 compared with the
tryptamine derivatives and DHE. Agonist-stimulated
[35S]GTP
S binding is a measure of
receptor-coupled G protein activation and thus of agonist intrinsic
activity (Pauwels et al., 1997
, 1998b
). F 11356 produced a similar
maximal enhancement of [35S]GTP
S binding to
5-HT in both h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptor systems, which was superior to
that obtained with the tryptamine derivatives examined and DHE, with
the exception of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan at h
5-HT1B receptors. The high-efficacy properties of
F 11356 at these receptors also contribute to the high potency of the
compound. These data indicate that F 11356 behaves as a potent,
high-efficacy agonist at h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptors, in a similar manner to the
endogenous agonist 5-HT.
In Vitro Activity in Vascular and Neuronal Models.
5-HT1B receptors have been shown to mediate
vasoconstriction (Hamel et al., 1993
; Valentin et al., 1996
), and any
involvement of 5-HT1D receptors in mediating
vasoconstriction has not been thus far demonstrated. The isolated
rabbit saphenous vein is a well established preparation in which
potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT1B/1D
receptor agonists have been determined (Martin and MacLennan, 1990
). F
11356 induced 5-HT1B receptor-mediated
contractions of isolated rabbit saphenous vein rings with a similar
potency and maximal response as those of 5-HT. Naratriptan,
sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan were less potent than F
11356. Although naratriptan produced equivalent maximum responses to F
11356 and 5-HT, those generated by rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and
zolmitriptan were of greater magnitude. As shown for sumatriptan
(Valentin et al., 1996
), a component of the contractile responses
evoked by rizatriptan and zolmitriptan is dependent on an intact
endothelium, suggesting the release of an endothelium-derived
contraction factor (Valentin et al., 1996
). However, this does not
appear to apply to F 11356 or naratriptan because both produced
equivalent maximum responses to 5-HT. In agreement with this finding,
no significant differences in maximum responses were noted between F
11356, 5-HT, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, and naratriptan in
the absence of endothelium (unpublished observations). Sensitivity of
contractile responses evoked by F 11356 to the mixed
5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (Clitherow et al., 1994
) supports the involvement of
5-HT1B receptors in mediating these responses, as
described previously for 5-HT, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, and sumatriptan
(Valentin et al., 1996
). The greater potency of F 11356 and 5-HT
compared with that of the tryptamine derivatives investigated is also
due in part to the high-efficacy characteristics of the former two
compounds at the saphenous vein 5-HT1B receptor. These data provide further confirmation of the superior potency of F
11356 at 5-HT1B receptors compared with the
tryptamine derivatives investigated and similar potency of F 11356 as
that of 5-HT. These data also demonstrate that F 11356 is active at the
vascular level, which is in line with the vascular hypothesis of
migraine (Ferrari and Saxena, 1993
).
Recent studies have identified an inhibitory action of
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists on trigeminal
neuronal firing (Hoskin et al., 1996
) as a potentially important
mechanism of therapeutic migraine abortive activity. These actions are
mediated by 5-HT1B/1D receptors (Goadsby and
Knight, 1997
). Predominantly 5-HT1D mRNA has been
detected in human and guinea pig trigeminal ganglia (Rebeck et al.,
1994
; Bouchelet et al., 1996
). In isolated guinea pig trigeminal
ganglion neurons, outward K+ currents involved in
regulating excitability (Sah, 1996
) were increased by both sumatriptan
and F 11356 in a GR 127935-sensitive manner. However, as observed in
the rabbit saphenous vein, F 11356 was more potent and, more
importantly, produced a greater magnitude of response compared with
sumatriptan. Responses evoked by F 11356 were abolished by the calcium
chelator EGTA, indicating Ca2+ dependence of
K+ current activation and suggesting that F 11356 hyperpolarizes trigeminal ganglion neurons by increasing an outward
Ca2+-dependent K+ current
after activation of 5-HT1B/1D receptors. However,
we have no evidence to indicate whether the receptors involved are 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, or both. A
similar activation of Ca2+-dependent
K+ current has been reported for sumatriptan in
C6 glioma cells stably expressing either recombinant h
5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D
receptors (Le Grand et al., 1998a
), indicating that both receptors may
be coupled to Ca2+-dependent
K+ channels. In addition to confirming
high-potency and high-efficacy characteristics of F 11356 at neuronal
5-HT1B/1D receptors, the data point to a key
mechanism by which F 11356 could reduce trigeminal neuronal firing and
sensory neuropeptide release, which is in line with the neurogenic
hypothesis of migraine (Moskowitz, 1992
). Moreover, the present data
strongly suggest that trigeminal ganglion neurons could represent
another key site of action for 5-HT1B/1D receptor
agonists, in addition to the peripheral sensory nerve-vessel interface
and central trigeminal nucleus caudalis. This is in contrast to a
previous report (O'Shaughnessy et al., 1993
) in which sumatriptan
failed to affect macroscopic tissue potentials that were recorded in
guinea pig trigeminal ganglia using an extracellular electrode.
F 11356 thus behaves as a high-potency, high-efficacy
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist in both vascular and
neuronal tissues that constitutively express these receptors.
Interestingly, the potency of F 11356 was similar in saphenous vein and
trigeminal ganglion neurons (pD2 = 7.1 and 7.3, respectively), but these values are around 2 log units lower than the
affinity and potency values reported in recombinant
5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor
systems. The same appears to be the case for sumatriptan and the other
tryptamine derivatives investigated. This could be explained
parsimoniously by major differences in receptor expression levels
between transfected systems (high) and native systems (low), although
further studies are warranted to clarify this issue.
In Vivo Pharmacological Profile of F 11356.
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists elicit
vasoconstriction in the carotid vascular bed of dogs (Feniuk et al.,
1989
) and pigs (Den Boer et al., 1991
). This pharmacological activity
is considered to be of importance in the migraine abortive effects of
5-HT1B/1D (previously
5-HT1-like) receptor agonists (Feniuk et al.,
1989
; Den Boer et al., 1991
; De Vries et al., 1996
) and is a key
element of the vascular hypothesis (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
; Ferrari and Saxena, 1993
). In anesthetized pigs, F 11356 elicited carotid vasoconstriction in a highly selective manner with respect to systemic
arterial pressure or coronary vascular resistance. F 11356 was more
than 10 times more potent than naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan,
or zolmitriptan in reducing carotid blood flow and consistently
produced greater maximum responses. Dose dependence of carotid
vasoconstriction elicited by sumatriptan and naratriptan had a
bell-shaped aspect suggestive of low agonist efficacy; and activation
of other mechanisms at higher doses to explain the downturn phase of
the dose-response curve can be excluded because sumatriptan-induced
carotid vasoconstriction is mediated exclusively by
5-HT1B/1D receptors (De Vries et al., 1996
).
Naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan thus displayed
moderate carotid vascular selectivity, which is consistent with low
intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B/1D receptors.
Furthermore, selective carotid vasoconstriction produced by F 11356 was
long lasting, remaining at near-maximal values 1 h after the drug
infusion was stopped. In contrast, carotid vasoconstriction evoked by
naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan was relatively
brief, having returned to near baseline values 1 h after drug
infusion was stopped. These data suggest that F 11356 has a longer
duration of action at 5-HT1B/1D receptors in vivo
than the tryptamine derivatives investigated. F 11356-induced carotid
vasoconstriction was abolished by GR 127935, suggesting exclusive
mediation by 5-HT1B/1D receptors, which is in
agreement with its in vitro receptor selectivity profile. GR 127935 per
se also produced weak carotid vasoconstriction, which is in agreement
with previous reports of intrinsic activity of the compound at
5-HT1B/1D receptors (Pauwels and Colpaert, 1995
;
De Vries et al., 1996
). These data demonstrate superior potency,
intrinsic activity, and in vivo selectivity of F 11356 at carotid
arterial 5-HT1B/1D receptors compared with
naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan. By virtue of
the greater efficacy of F 11356 in producing
5-HT1B/1D receptor-mediated carotid vasoconstriction, the craniovascular selectivity of the drug, with
respect to coronary and systemic vasoconstriction, is superior to that
of the tryptamine derivatives investigated.
Orally administered F 11356 dose dependently (from 0.63 mg/kg) and
significantly decreased unilateral carotid blood flow in conscious dogs
without significantly affecting heart rate or behavior. The decreases
in carotid blood flow produced by F 11356 were long lasting, which is
in agreement with those observed in anesthetized pigs. These data
indicate that F 11356 is orally active and that the drug is well
tolerated. The decreases in carotid blood flow observed with F 11356 in
anesthetized pigs and conscious dogs are in agreement with the
high-potency, -selectivity, and -efficacy characteristics at
5-HT1B/1D receptors observed in vitro. High intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B/1D receptors is
therefore likely to be necessary for detectable changes in carotid
blood flow to occur in the conscious animal because carotid blood flow
is lower than that in anesthetized pigs or dogs (De Vries et al., 1996
) and because baroreflex compensatory control is operational.
Decreases in carotid blood flow were not observed with sumatriptan,
naratriptan, or zolmitriptan. Two reasons may be invoked to explain
this. First, each of these drugs produced marked clinical signs,
indicating that oral absorption was likely to have occurred. Higher
doses of these drugs (i.e., from 0.63 mg/kg naratriptan and
zolmitriptan and from 2.5 mg/kg sumatriptan) tended to produce tachycardia, which could offset or mask any detectable changes in
carotid flow. Second, the intrinsic activity of the latter three drugs
at 5-HT1B/1D receptors might have been
insufficient to produce decreases in carotid blood flow and to overcome
compensatory reflex control.
The powerful and selective carotid vasoconstrictor action of F 11356 thus is in line with the vascular hypothesis (Den Boer et al., 1991
;
Ferrari and Saxena, 1993
) in which constriction of cranial vessels is
considered to attenuate migraine-induced vasodilatation (Humphrey and
Feniuk, 1991
).
Access to the central nervous system is claimed to contribute to the
therapeutic antimigraine effects of 5-HT1B/1D
receptor agonists (Goadsby and Edvinsson, 1994
) by reducing the
excitability of central trigeminal neurons and thus nociception, of
which the second-order neurons reside in the brain stem trigeminal
nucleus caudalis (Hoskin et al., 1996
). In this perspective, the guinea pig hypothermia model is useful because only
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists that penetrate the
blood-brain barrier elicit an hypothermic response by activating
central 5-HT1B receptors (Skingle et al., 1994
;
Hagan et al., 1997
). F 11356 dose dependently produced hypothermic responses in guinea pigs after oral administration, at doses similar to
those that evoked decreases in carotid blood flow in dogs. Sumatriptan
and DHE showed little or no activity, after either oral or i.p.
administration, which is suggestive of poor access to the central
nervous system and in agreement with previous reports (Humphrey et al.,
1991
; Tfelt-Hansen and Lipton, 1993
). These data strongly suggest that
F 11356 gains access to the central nervous system after oral administration.
In Vivo Receptor Selectivity.
F 11356 failed to produce
behavioral effects in rats, even at a relatively high dose (40 mg/kg),
indicating that receptor selectivity of F 11356 for
5-HT1B/1D receptors versus
5-HT1A receptors is maintained in vivo.
Further Cardiovascular Studies.
Data obtained in vitro with F
11356 in canine coronary artery rings revealed that the compound
produced equivalent, low-amplitude maximal responses to sumatriptan,
naratriptan, and DHE and was more potent than sumatriptan but less
potent than naratriptan and DHE. In view of the high-efficacy
properties of F 11356 compared with the other compounds investigated,
greater maximal responses might have been expected but were not
observed, which is in accord with the absence of changes in coronary
vascular resistance in anesthetized pigs and the high degree of
craniovascular selectivity exhibited by F 11356 in vivo described
earlier. We have no obvious explanation as to why F 11356 behaves in a
similar fashion to the tryptamine derivatives studied and DHE in
producing weak coronary vasoconstriction. One possible reason is that
5-HT1B receptor-effector coupling in this tissue
can produce only limited contractile responses, even on maximal
activation. Although relatively weak contractile responses evoked by
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists in isolated coronary arteries have been shown by others (Connor et al., 1997
; Maassen Van
Den Brink et al., 1998
; Valentin et al., 1998
), further studies are
required to address this important issue.
In isolated perfused guinea pig hearts with coronary vascular tone
raised after nitric oxide synthase inhibition to induce endothelial
dysfunction, a high concentration of F 11356 (32 µM) was without
effect on coronary vascular resistance or left ventricular contractility. Under similar conditions, lower concentrations of
sumatriptan (pD2 = 5.4) produced left ventricular
diastolic (ischemic-type) contracture that did not affect coronary
vascular resistance and was not 5-HT1B/1D
receptor mediated (Le Grand et al., 1998b
).
In isolated guinea pig papillary muscles, F 11356 failed to
significantly affect any of the action potential parameters recorded, suggesting that the drug appears to be devoid of arrhythmogenic potential.
Conclusion.
In summary, F 11356 is a novel arylpiperazide 5-HT
derivative; is a selective, high-potency agonist at
5-HT1B/1D receptors; and distinguishes itself
from tryptamine and derivatives and DHE in exerting exceptional
intrinsic activity at these receptors in models relevant to the
vascular and neurogenic hypotheses of migraine. By virtue of its
high-efficacy properties at 5-HT1B/1D receptors,
F 11356 displays hitherto unobserved high levels of craniovascular
selectivity in vivo with respect to coronary and systemic
vasoconstriction. Despite high intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B receptors, the amplitude of canine
coronary vasoconstriction evoked by F 11356 was not greater than that
observed with sumatriptan, naratriptan, or DHE. The level of intrinsic
activity of F 11356 obtained at 5-HT1B/1D
receptors is comparable to that of the endogenous agonist 5-HT. The
selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists derived from tryptamine that have been described thus far, including
sumatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and eletriptan,
behave as partial agonists (i.e., have low agonist efficacy at these receptors with respect to 5-HT; Connor et al., 1997
; Martin et al.,
1997
; Pauwels et al., 1997
; Willems et al., 1998
), which might limit
their oral clinical antimigraine effectiveness (Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby,
1998a
, b
). Clinical studies with a high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, of which F 11356 is
the first, are therefore justified to verify the hypothesis that the
magnitude of intrinsic activity at these receptors is a key determinant of therapeutic antimigraine effectiveness. F 11356 is orally active, gains access to the central nervous system, has a long duration of
action, and is well tolerated. As a putative antimigraine drug, F 11356 may exert high-efficacy agonist activity throughout the entire
trigeminovascular system in which 5-HT1B/1D
receptors are located: at its peripheral sensory nerve-vessel interface
and the ganglion and central (brain stem) levels. Thus, F 11356 has the
potential to exert greater therapeutic antimigraine activity than
other, currently available treatments.
We are grateful to our colleagues in the Divisions of
Cardiovascular Diseases II, Neurobiology I and II, and Medicinal
Chemistry IV and the Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology for
excellent technical assistance; to Drs. J. P. Ribet, J. L. Maurel, and C. Jorand-Lebrun for the synthesis of reference compounds;
to G. Guerin and S. Cecco for excellent secretarial assistance; and to
Dr. J. M. Guillon for critical comments and help with the figures.
Accepted for publication March 4, 1999.
Received for publication December 14, 1998.