JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by John, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Colpaert, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by John, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Colpaert, F. C.

Vol. 290, Issue 1, 83-95, July 1999

F 11356, a Novel 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) Derivative with Potent, Selective, and Unique High Intrinsic Activity at 5-HT1B/1D Receptors in Models Relevant to Migraine1

Gareth W. John, Petrus J. Pauwels, Michel Perez, Serge Halazy, Bruno Le Grand, Yvan Verscheure, Jean-Pierre Valentin, Christiane Palmier, Thierry Wurch, Philippe Chopin, Marc Marien, Mark S. Kleven, Wouter Koek, Marie-Bernadette Assié, Elisabeth Carilla-Durand, Jean-Pierre Tarayre and Francis C. Colpaert

Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Castres Cedex, France


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

F 11356 (4-[4-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-1H-indol-5-yloxyl]acetyl]piperazinyl-1-yl]benzonitrile) was designed to take advantage of the superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) compared with tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors. F 11356 has subnanomolar affinity for cloned human and nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, and its affinity for 5-HT1A and other 5-HT receptors, including the 5-ht1F subtype, is 50-fold lower and micromolar, respectively. In C6 cells expressing human 5-HT1B or human 5-HT1D receptors, F 11356 was the most potent compound in inhibiting forskolin-induced cyclic AMP formation (pD2 = 8.9 and 9.6), and in contrast to tryptamine and derivatives, it produced maximal enhancement of [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate-specific binding equivalent to 5-HT. F 11356 was equipotent to 5-HT (pD2 = 7.1 versus 7.2) and more potent than tryptamine derivatives in contracting rabbit isolated saphenous vein. In isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion neurons, F 11356 was more potent (pD2 = 7.3 versus 6.7) and induced greater increases in outward hyperpolarizing Ca2+-dependent K+ current than sumatriptan. In anesthetized pigs, F 11356 elicited highly cranioselective, more potent (from 0.16 µg/kg i.v.) and greater carotid vasoconstriction than tryptamine derivatives. Decreases in carotid blood flow were observed in conscious dogs from 0.63 mg/kg oral F 11356 in the absence of changes in heart rate or behavior. Oral activity was confirmed when hypothermic responses were elicited in guinea pigs (ED50 = 1.6 mg/kg), suggesting that F 11356 also accesses the brain. F 11356 thus is a selective, high-potency agonist at 5-HT1B/1D receptors, which distinguishes itself from tryptamine and derivatives in exerting high intrinsic activity at these receptors in vascular and neuronal models relevant to migraine.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The launch of the first selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B/1D receptor agonist sumatriptan (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991) in the early 1990s has been hailed as the most significant advance in the acute treatment of migraine since the introduction of dihydroergotamine (DHE) more than 50 years ago. Sumatriptan therefore represented a major new therapeutic principle in migraine, selectively activating 5-HT1B/1D receptor subtypes (previously 5-HT1-like; Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991). Although the precise mechanism by which sumatriptan alleviates migraine is still not fully elucidated, three distinct pharmacological actions on the vasculature and neurons have been invoked to explain its antimigraine effect. Vasoconstriction of cranial blood vessels (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991; Ferrari and Saxena, 1993), inhibition of neurogenic inflammation involving reduced vasodilator sensory neuropeptide release from peripheral (dural) trigeminal nerve terminals (Moskowitz, 1992) and/or inhibition of firing of trigeminal neurons (Hoskin et al., 1996) have been proposed. Sumatriptan is an effective acute treatment for migraine (Ferrari, 1998), but it has major limitations: low oral bioavailability (see Goadsby, 1998b), fewer than half of the patients who are treated are pain free at 2 h after drug administration, and about one third of responders experience headache recurrence within 24 to 48 h (Ferrari, 1998). The room for improvement over the clinical effectiveness of sumatriptan is therefore substantial. Thus, newer agents, all of which are tryptamine derivatives, including naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan, have improved oral bioavailabilities (40-74%; Ferrari, 1998; Goadsby, 1998b) but apparently have not superseded sumatriptan in terms of therapeutic effectiveness according to initial reports (Ferrari, 1998; Goadsby, 1998a, b). Indeed, a limited therapeutic response ("ceiling effect") to this class of agents in aborting a migraine attack is currently being unveiled (Ferrari, 1998; Goadsby, 1998a, b).

The rationale for our chemical approach was to take advantage of the superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT compared with tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors because we hypothesized that the magnitude of the intrinsic activity that is produced at 5-HT1B/1D receptors by selective agonists is a key determinant of therapeutic antimigraine effectiveness. Most, if not all, of the selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists derived from tryptamine that have been described to date, including sumatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and eletriptan, behave as partial agonists with respect to the endogenous agonist 5-HT (Connor et al., 1997; Martin et al., 1997; Pauwels et al., 1997; Willems et al., 1998). Moreover, it might be considered, on theoretical grounds, that the relatively low intrinsic activity of the currently available 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists might limit their therapeutic effectiveness in alleviating migraine. In principle, a high-efficacy agonist will have the advantage over a lower efficacy agonist (i.e., a partial agonist) in producing full responses whatever the extent of receptor reserve in the tissue or organ in question (Kenakin, 1993). Thus, and in contrast to a partial agonist, a high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist can be expected to elicit large amplitude responses throughout the entire peripheral and central trigeminovascular system where 5-HT1B/1D receptors are located. The outcome of our research effort is F 11356 (Perez et al., 1995; Fig. 1), which is presently shown to exert potent and selective actions, and exceptionally high efficacy at 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors both in vitro and in vivo in models relevant to the vascular and neurogenic hypotheses in migraine. Because F 11356 is orally active, has a long duration of action, gains access to the brain, and is well tolerated in animals, the drug is endowed with the potential to provide acute therapeutic relief from migraine headache, which is superior to that offered by currently available treatments.


View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Chemical structure of F 11356, a novel arylpiperazide derivative of serotonin. For details of chemical synthesis, see Perez et al. (1995).

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

All experiments were carried out in accordance with the European Communities Counsel Directive of November 24, 1986 (86/609/EEC), and the National Institutes of Health "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NIH publication no. 85-23, revised 1985) and were approved by the local ethics committee.

Receptor-Binding Assays. F 11356 and other ligands were examined in vitro using membrane preparations from brain tissue or mammalian cell lines expressing recombinant 5-HT receptors. Radioligand-binding studies were performed as previously described in cell lines that had been transfected with the following receptors or gene products: human (h) 5-HT1A (HeLa/HA7: Pauwels and Palmier, 1995), h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D (Cos-7: Pauwels et al., 1995; C6 rat glioma: Pauwels et al., 1996, 1997; Wurch et al., 1997b), rabbit 5-HT1B (Cos-7: Wurch et al., 1997b), rat 5-HT1B (Cos-7: Pleus and Bylund, 1992), guinea pig 5-HT1B (C6 rat glioma: Pauwels et al., 1998b), rat and guinea pig 5-HT1D (Cos-7: Wurch et al., 1997a), h 5-HT1E and h 5-HT1F (Cos-7: Pauwels et al. 1997), h 5-HT2A (HEK 293: Leysen et al., 1982), h 5-HT5A (Cos-7: Rees et al., 1994), h 5-HT6 (Cos-7: Monsma et al., 1993), h 5-HT7 (Cos-7: To et al., 1995), and rat 5-HT7 (Cos-7: Shen et al., 1993).

Radioligand-binding studies were performed as previously described in the brain area indicated on the following native receptors: rat 5-HT1A (hippocampus: Pauwels and Palmier, 1994), ovine 5-HT1B/1D (caudate nucleus: Pauwels et al., 1993), rat 5-HT2A (frontal cortex: Kleven et al., 1997), and guinea pig 5-HT4 (caudate nucleus: Grossman et al., 1993). Finally, murine 5-HT3 receptor binding studied was performed in the hybrid NG 108 CC 15 cell line, as described by Neijt et al. (1988). Compounds were studied at concentrations ranging from 0.01 nM to 10 µM, using Whatman GF/B filters to terminate incubation.

Inhibition of Forskolin-Induced Cyclic AMP (cAMP) Formation. Inhibition of forskolin (100 µM)-induced cAMP formation in C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B, h 5-HT1D, or h 5-HT1A receptors, respectively, by F 11356 and other ligands was investigated as described previously (Pauwels et al. 1996).

Stimulation of Specific [35S]Guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgamma S) Radioligand Binding. [35S]GTPgamma S specific binding was determined in the presence or absence of F 11356 and other ligands in C6 glioma cell membranes stably expressing h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors, as described previously (Pauwels et al. 1997). Maximal stimulation of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding was expressed as a percentage of the response obtained with 10 µM 5-HT.

Contractile Responses in Rabbit Isolated Saphenous Vein. Rabbit isolated saphenous vein rings with intact endothelium were prepared for isometric tension recording, as previously described (Valentin et al., 1996), in the presence of Nomega -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 10 µM) to inhibit endothelial NO synthase. Cumulative concentration-effect curves were determined for F 11356, 5-HT, sumatriptan, and naratriptan in either the presence or absence of the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (Clitherow et al., 1994).

Stimulation of Outward K+ Current in Guinea Pig Isolated Trigeminal Ganglion Cells. Guinea pig trigeminal ganglion cells were isolated from right and left ganglia as described by Liu and Simon (1994) and were cultured for 12 to 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 in a Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% heat-inactivated DCS. Outward K+ currents were studied as described previously (Le Grand et al., 1998a) in trigeminal ganglion cells using the patch-clamp technique in the whole-cell configuration. Cumulative concentration-effect curves were obtained for F 11356 and sumatriptan, with each concentration being applied for 3 min. Steady-state outward currents (IKss) were measured at the end of a 3-s test pulse (stimulation frequency = 0.05 Hz) relative to the current before the beginning of the test pulse. Experiments were repeated in either the presence or absence of GR 127935 (0.1 µM).

Hypothermia in Guinea Pigs. Rectal temperature was measured to the nearest 0.1°C in male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (300-400 g; Charles River, France) as described by Skingle et al. (1994). Temperature measurements were taken immediately before the oral administration of F 11356 and other compounds, and at 15 and 30 min and 1, 2, 4, and 8 h after drug or vehicle administration. Drugs were administered in 1% methyl cellulose in distilled water.

Potency to induce hypothermia (ED50 values) was determined as the dose producing a significant reduction of rectal temperature (<= 38.2°C) in 50% of the animals. Temperatures of <= 38.2°C were considered to be significantly reduced because in preliminary experiments, values of <= 38.2°C occurred only in 1 of 230 (0.4%) control animals. Also, baseline body temperature was 38.4-39.1°C in all animals in the present study.

Carotid Hemodynamics in Anesthetized Pigs. Male Landrace pigs (19-25 kg; M. Gaec, Soreze, France) were anesthetized with azaperone (3 mg/kg i.m.) followed by sodium pentobarbital (25 mg/kg i.v. bolus and 10-20 mg/kg/h infusion) and then intubated and artificially ventilated (Alpha100, Minerve, Esternay, France) with a mixture of room air and oxygen (0.5-1 liter/min). Blood gases and arterial pressure were maintained within physiological limits. Heparin (500 IU/kg i.v.) was also administered. Before thoracotomy, catheters were placed in the inferior vena cava via the left saphenous vein for drug/vehicle administration and in the right saphenous vein for anesthesia. Femoral arteries were cannulated (7F; Vygon, Ecouen, France) for aortic blood pressure measurements (Statham P10EZ transducers) or for arterial blood gas determinations (ABL-510; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Blood flow was measured in left and right common carotid arteries and left anterior descending coronary artery by means of appropriately sized flow probes connected to a pulsed Doppler flow amplifier (VF1; Crystal Biotech, Northboro, MA). Body temperature was maintained at 37-38°C (by means of a thermostated insulating blanket), and sterile saline was infused i.v. throughout the experiment to compensate fluid loss (0.5-1 liter total volume). Parameters were digitized and analyzed on line by computer using interactive software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech). Calculated parameters were as follows: total carotid vascular resistance was derived from mean arterial pressure divided by total carotid blood flow, and coronary vascular resistance was derived from coronary perfusion pressure divided by left anterior descending coronary blood flow. Coronary perfusion pressure was determined as the difference between diastolic aortic pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

After a 30-min stabilization period, animals received an i.v. infusion of either vehicle [40% polyethylene glycol 300 in sterile saline (n = 9) or sterile saline (n = 10) in 52.5 ml over 105 min] or cumulative doses of F 11356 (0.01, 0.04, 0.16, 0.63, 2.5, 10, and 40 µg/kg i.v. in 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7) or sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, or zolmitriptan (0.63, 2.5, 10, 40, 160, 630, and 2500 µg/kg i.v. in 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7). Note lower doses of F 11356 used due to higher potency of the drug. Parameters were measured up to 60 min after infusion of the highest dose of drug (or vehicle equivalent) was stopped for assessment of response recovery. In separate experiments, pigs received an i.v. infusion of GR 127935 (0.63 mg/kg, n = 6) or its vehicle (n = 7), followed 15 min later by F 11356 (0.01-40 µg/kg i.v., as above; 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7) or its vehicle (n = 6).

Oral Activity in Conscious Dogs. Four male beagle dogs (18-25 kg; CEDS, Toucy, France) were sedated with a mixture of fentanyl and fluanizone (Hypnorm, 0.1 ml/kg i.m.), received atropine (0.02 mg/kg i.m.), and were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (20-25 mg/kg i.v.). After intubation, anesthesia was maintained under artificial ventilation with isoflurane (1-2%) in oxygen (2-4 liters/min) and room air (5-6 liters/min). Under sterile conditions, a ventral neck incision was made, the left carotid artery was isolated, and an appropriately sized pulsed Doppler flow probe (2.8-3.2 mm; Crystal Biotech) was placed around the vessel and secured. Cables were externalized under the neck skin between the scapulae, in an anchor button system (Bioseb, Chaville, France), to maintain sterility. After surgery, each dog was treated with buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg s.c.) and penicillin-procaine (Duphaphen-LA; 0.2 ml/kg i.m.) for 3 days for analgesic and antibiotic coverage, respectively. During the postoperative period, dogs were trained to lie quietly in a cage. Experiments were conducted 2 to 3 weeks after surgery, and external wires were protected by a nylon vest (Phymep, Paris, France) that the dogs had previously been trained to wear. The four-limb electrocardiogram was derived from lead II and was used for computerized calculation of heart rate. Carotid blood flow and electrocardiographic signals were digitized and recorded on line using interactive software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech).

The effects of orally administered drugs (F 11356, sumatriptan, naratriptan, or zolmitriptan) or placebo (gelatin capsules, 44000 KS, Capsugel) on carotid flow, electrocardiography, and behavior were observed continuously for the first 4 h and then at 6- and 12-h intervals after drug or placebo administration. For each experiment, each animal received only one dose of a particular drug, and a washout period of 7 days was observed between experiments.

In Vivo Receptor Selectivity Studies. Behavioral studies were performed in rats in which lower-lip retraction, flat body posture, and forepaw treading were quantified as described previously (Kleven et al., 1995; n = 6 rats/group).

Further Cardiovascular Studies. Studies of contractile responses in canine isolated coronary arteries were performed as described previously (Valentin et al., 1998). Effects in isolated, Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts were assessed as described by Le Grand et al. (1998b). Effects on action potentials recorded in isolated guinea pig papillary muscle were evaluated as described by Le Grand et al. (1995).

Data Analysis. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Concentration- and dose-response curves were fitted using the Marquardt algorithm by means of appropriate software (Origin; Microcal, Northhampton, MA), which gave geometric EC50 or ED50 values with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed on absolute values by ANOVA with or without repeated measurements followed by the Dunnett's post hoc test, as appropriate (Sigmastat; Jandel GmbH, Erkrath, Germany; or Statview; Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA), unless stated otherwise. p < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Drugs and Vehicles. F 11356 hydrochloride, sumatriptan hydrochloride, rizatriptan hemisulfate, zolmitriptan base, naratriptan base, GR 127935 dihydrochloride, and (+)-flesinoxan hydrochloride were synthesized by the Divisions of Medicinal Chemistry IV and Analytical Chemistry at the Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre.

All other agents used, including 5-HT, creatinine sulfate, ketanserin tartrate, idazoxan hydrochloride, DHE mesylate, prazosin hydrochloride, indomethacin, and L-NAME were purchased commercially (RBI, Natick, MA; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; and Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK).

For in vitro experiments, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, GR 127935, 5-HT, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, prazosin, indomethacin, idazoxan, L-NAME, (+)-flesinoxan, and DHE were dissolved in distilled water, whereas naratriptan, zolmitriptan, and F 11356 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide such that the final bath concentration did not exceed 0.1%. For in vivo studies, drugs were weighed as base, taking into account the salt-to-base ratio. Sumatriptan and rizatriptan were dissolved in sterile saline, whereas F 11356, zolmitriptan, and naratriptan were dissolved in polyethylene glycol (40%) in sterile saline.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Affinity, Potency, Efficacy, and Selectivity of F 11356 at Human and Nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D Receptors. F 11356 had subnanomolar affinity for cloned human, guinea pig, rabbit, and rat 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, with pKi values ranging from 9.3 to 10.3 (Table 1). F 11356 had 50 times less binding affinity for the human and rat 5-HT1A receptor (pKi = 7.6-7.8; Table 1) and low affinity for other 5-HT receptor subtypes, including the h 5-HT1F-binding site (Table 1). Thus, F 11356 had high affinity at and high selectivity for 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors. F 11356 did not distinguish between 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, possessing equivalent affinity at these sites (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
In vitro 5-HT receptor binding profile of F 11356 

Radioligand binding experiments were performed as described in the text.

The potency of F 11356 was compared with that of 5-HT, tryptamine, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and DHE in inhibiting forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and enhancement of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding in C6 glioma cells stably transfected with h 5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D receptor genes. As shown in Table 2, F 11356 was the most potent compound in inhibiting cAMP accumulation mediated by h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors and was notably more potent than 5-HT; only zolmitriptan was equipotent to F 11356 in mediating h 5-HT1D responses. No significant differences were observed in maximal responses evoked by the agonists (data not shown; see also Pauwels et al., 1997). The inhibition by F 11356 of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was insurmountably antagonized by the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (0.01-1 µM) in C6 glioma cells expressing h 5-HT1B receptors, with responses being abolished by 0.1 µM GR 127935 (data not shown). In C6 glioma cells expressing h 5-HT1D receptors, F 11356-mediated inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was competitively and concentration-dependently antagonized by the mixed 5-HT2A/2C/1D receptor antagonist ketanserin (0.1-10 µM; Pauwels et al., 1995) with a pA2 value of 7.01 and a slope of 0.81 as determined by Schild analysis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP formation and enhancement of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding in membranes of C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D receptors

Inhibition of forskolin (100 µM)-induced cAMP accumulation and enhancement of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding was determined as described in the text. pD2 values correspond to the negative logarithm of the geometric drug concentration that produces 50% of its maximal response and are expressed with 95% CI. pD2 app. corresponds to apparent pD2 values. n corresponds to the number of independent experiments. N.D., not determined.

Similarly, F 11356 was more potent than 5-HT, tryptamine, and the tryptamine derivatives studied in enhancing specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding via h 5-HT1B and h5-HT1D receptors, and was equipotent to DHE (Table 2). A major finding of these studies is that F 11356 stimulated specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding with greater potency but with similar efficacy compared with the endogenous agonist 5-HT (Fig. 2) at both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors. Among the tryptamine derivatives investigated, only zolmitriptan and sumatriptan approached the efficacy of 5-HT or F 11356 at the h 5-HT1B but not at the h 5-HT1D receptor (Fig. 2). Tryptamine produced maximum enhancement of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding at h 5-HT1B receptors of only 56 ± 5.5% (n = 3). Rizatriptan, DHE, and naratriptan exhibited relative efficacy at h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors higher than tryptamine but lower than all other compounds shown in Fig. 2.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Maximal enhancement of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding in C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B (top) and 5-HT1D receptors (bottom), as described by Pauwels et al. (1997). F 11356 produced equivalent maximum responses (Emax) to 5-HT at both receptors, which was not the case for the other drugs investigated. Data were normalized to 5-HT = 100% enhancement of specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding. For relative potencies, refer to Table 2. Data are mean ± S.E.M. *p < .01 versus 5-HT (Mann-Whitney U test). Data for sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, and DHE are from Pauwels et al. (1997).

In C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1A receptors, F 11356 inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP formation with a pD2 value of 5.94 (0.12; n = 3) compared with 9.61 (0.17, n = 2) for DHE, 5.36 (0.19; n = 2) for zolmitriptan, 5.61 (0.17; n = 2) for naratriptan, and <5 (n = 2) for sumatriptan and rizatriptan, respectively.

Collectively, the data indicated that F 11356 had high affinity, efficacy, and selectivity at recombinant 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors from a number of species.

In Vitro Vascular and Neuronal Actions of F 11356. In isolated rabbit saphenous vein rings prepared for isometric tension recording as described previously (Valentin et al., 1996), F 11356 was equipotent to 5-HT and more potent than naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and sumatriptan in producing contractile responses (Table 3). Furthermore, like naratriptan, F 11356, produced equivalent maximal responses to 5-HT, whereas superior maximal responses compared with 5-HT were elicited by sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan. Contractile responses evoked by F 11356 were antagonized by GR 127935 in a noncompetitive manner, with a pIC50 value of 9.3 (8.6-10.1), and were abolished by 0.1 µM.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist potencies and efficacies in the rabbit isolated saphenous vein

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4
Baseline values of hemodynamic parameters in anesthetized pigs

Values are mean ± S.E.M. after 30-min stabilization and before drug/vehicle administration. n, indicates number of animals. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or coronary vascular resistance.

In isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion neurons, outward K+ currents were recorded by the patch-clamp technique in the whole-cell configuration. As shown in Fig. 3A, F 11356 was more potent and, more importantly, produced a greater magnitude of response than sumatriptan in stimulating outward K+ current [pD2 = 7.3 (6.9-8.1) and 6.7 (6.5-6.9) for F 11356 and sumatriptan, respectively]. The stimulatory effect of F 11356, as well as that of sumatriptan, was abolished by GR 127935 (0.1 µM; Fig. 3B). Moreover, the selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+)-flesinoxan (1 µM) failed to evoke any increase in K+ current (maximum change, -4.3 ± 0.8%; p = NS compared with vehicle; data not shown). When the calcium ion chelator EGTA (5 mM) was included in the patch pipette, F 11356 (1 µM) produced no increase in outward K+ current (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, increases in outward steady-state (ss) hyperpolarizing K+ current (IK) evoked by F 11356 () and sumatriptan (open circle ) in isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion cells. Note greater potency and amplitude of responses elicited by F 11356. *p < .05 compared with sumatriptan (ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Student's t test). B, maximum increases in IKss evoked by F 11356 and sumatriptan in the presence or absence of GR 127935 (0.1 µM) or EGTA (5 mM). *p < .05 compared with vehicle controls (ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Student's t test). Data are mean ± S.E.M. See Materials and Methods for further details.

Thus, in the isolated rabbit saphenous vein and in isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion neurons, F 11356 behaves as a potent, high-efficacy agonist at native 5-HT1B/1D receptors.

In Vivo Activity of F 11356 at Carotid Arterial 5-HT1B/1D Receptors. Baseline values of hemodynamic parameters in anesthetized pigs are shown in Table 4. F 11356, administered as cumulative i.v. infusions to anesthetized pigs, induced a pronounced, dose-related reduction in total carotid blood flow [ED50 = 0.53 (0.42-0.67) µg/kg i.v.]. F 11356 simultaneously evoked large magnitude increases in total carotid vascular resistance (Fig. 4A). Mean systemic arterial pressure was increased by F 11356 only at the dose of 10 µg/kg (maximum change, 17 ± 5%, p < .05 compared with vehicle, Fig. 4A). Sumatriptan failed to significantly decrease total carotid blood flow or to affect mean arterial pressure (p = NS) and produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of increases in total carotid vascular resistance (Fig. 4B). Naratriptan significantly reduced total carotid blood flow only at the dose of 40 µg/kg (p < .05 compared with vehicle) and, like sumatriptan, produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of increases in total carotid vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure (Fig. 4C). Zolmitriptan and rizatriptan dose-dependently and moderately reduced total carotid blood flow [ED50 = 5.6 (2.8-11.2) and 19.8 (6.8-57.0), respectively]. Although zolmitriptan produced dose-dependent, moderate increases in total carotid vascular resistance (Fig. 4D), rizatriptan significantly (p < .05) increased total carotid vascular resistance at 40 µg/kg but not at other doses (Fig. 4E). Zolmitriptan produced slight increases in mean arterial pressure at 10 and 40 µg/kg (Fig. 4D), whereas rizatriptan was without effect (Fig. 4E). Near-maximal reductions in total carotid blood flow (-48 ± 4%; p < .05 compared with vehicle) and increased total carotid vascular resistance (99 ± 8%; p < .05 compared with vehicle) with F 11356 were only slowly reversible, being maintained for at least 60 min after the infusion of F 11356 was stopped (Fig. 5). As illustrated in Fig. 5, increases in total carotid vascular resistance had returned to near-control values 60 min after the infusion of sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan was stopped, which is in contrast to that observed with F 11356. The drugs and vehicle investigated had no significant effects on heart rate or coronary vascular resistance (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5
Baseline values of hemodynamic parameters in conscious dogs before oral drug/placebo administration



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Comparison of increases in total carotid vascular resistance () and mean arterial pressure () elicited by F 11356 (A), sumatriptan (B), naratriptan (C), zolmitriptan (D), and rizatriptan (E) in anesthetized pigs. Note different abscissa in A (greater potency of F 11356) and bell-shaped dose-response curve in B and C. *p < .05 compared with vehicle (ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's test).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of F 11356, naratriptan, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and corresponding vehicles on total carotid vascular resistance in anesthetized pigs 60 min after drug/vehicle infusion was stopped. Increases in total carotid vascular resistance remained at near-maximal values 60 min after F 11356 infusion was stopped. Data are mean ± S.E.M. *p < .05 compared with corresponding vehicle controls (one-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's test).

In an additional series of experiments in animals pretreated with GR 127935 (0.63 mg/kg, n = 5), F 11356-induced increases in total carotid vascular resistance (+132 ± 10%, p < .05) and decreases in total carotid blood flow (-50 ± 3%, p < .05) were abolished (+26 ± 11%, p = NS; and -15 ± 6%, p = NS, respectively, compared with GR 127935 alone). GR 127935 per se weakly increased carotid vascular resistance (maximum change, +34 ± 18% compared with +4 ± 7% in the vehicle group, p < .05) and tended to reduce total carotid blood flow (maximum change, -20 ± 10% compared with +3 ± 4% in the vehicle-group, p = NS).

In conscious dogs, baseline heart rate and mean left carotid blood flow values before drug/placebo administration were similar in all groups (Table 5). Orally administered F 11356 dose-dependently reduced carotid blood flow from 0.63 mg/kg (n = 3) without significantly affecting heart rate (Fig. 6). F 11356 (0.16 mg/kg, n = 4) failed to significantly affect carotid blood flow or heart rate (data not shown). Decreases in carotid blood flow evoked by F 11356 were long lasting, remaining significantly reduced 12 h after the administration at 2.5 mg/kg p.o. (n = 4; Fig. 6A). As shown in Fig. 6A, decreases in carotid blood flow were noticeable within 30 min after F 11356 administration. Furthermore, F 11356 failed to produce clinical signs over 48 h after administration. Sumatriptan (2.5 and 10 mg/kg, n = 4 and 3, respectively) and naratriptan and zolmitriptan (both at 0.16 mg/kg, n = 4 in each case, and 0.63 mg/kg, n = 4 and 3, respectively) failed to significantly reduce carotid blood flow (data not shown). Prominent clinical signs were observed in each animal after 2.5 mg/kg sumatriptan and 0.63 mg/kg naratriptan and zolmitriptan and included mydriasis, exophthalmos, vocalization, restlessness, tachycardia, apprehension, and increased respiratory rate. These clinical signs were observed for up to 12 h after drug administration. Placebo had no significant effects on carotid blood flow, heart rate, or clinical signs (Fig. 6).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of orally administered F 11356 (0.63 mg/kg, black-triangle, and 2.5 mg/kg, black-square) and placebo (empty gelatin capsules, open circle ) on unilateral carotid blood flow (A) and heart rate (B) in conscious dogs. Data are mean ± S.E.M. Dose-dependent and long-lasting (more than 12 h at 2.5 mg/kg) reductions in carotid blood flow were observed with F 11356 in the absence of changes in heart rate, behavior, or clinical signs. At this dose, maximum values were attained 30 min after F 11356 administration. *p < .05 compared with placebo (one-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's test).

Hypothermia in Guinea Pigs. Orally administered F 11356 evoked hypothermic responses in guinea pigs and was found to be more potent than sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and DHE (Table 6). Relatively high doses (up to 40 mg/kg) of sumatriptan and DHE failed to produce hypothermic responses of sufficient magnitude to determine ED50 values.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6
Drug potencies in producing hypothemia in guinea pigs after oral administration

In Vivo Receptor Selectivity of F 11356. The in vitro procedures described earlier indicated that F 11356 had affinity for 5-HT1A receptors that is 50-fold lower than that for 5-HT1B/1D receptors. In rats, characteristic behavioral effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists such as lower-lip retraction, flat body posture, or forepaw treading (Kleven et al., 1995) were not observed after a high dose of F 11356 (40 mg/kg p.o.; data not given).

Collectively, the data suggest that the high-potency, -efficacy, and -selectivity characteristics of F 11356 observed in vitro are also manifested in vivo.

Further Cardiovascular Studies. The studies performed in anesthetized pigs and conscious dogs described earlier demonstrate that F 11356, at the pharmacological doses investigated, is devoid of any major hemodynamic side effects. The following studies have been carried out to extend its cardiovascular profile: Contractile responses evoked by F 11356 were compared with those of DHE, naratriptan, and sumatriptan in the canine isolated coronary artery as described previously (Valentin et al., 1998; n = 15-17 rings/group) in the absence of endothelium. All four agonists contracted coronary arteries, with a rank order of potency (pD2 values) of DHE [6.9 (5.3-7.9)] >=  naratriptan [6.8 (5.7-7.3)] >=  F 11356 [6.7 (5.7-7.3)] > sumatriptan [4.8 (3.6-5.6)]. Rank order of intrinsic activity (Emax ± S.E.M.) was sumatriptan (2.5 ± 0.6 mN) > naratriptan (1.7 ± 0.6 mN) > F 11356 (1.0 ± 0.4 mN) > DHE (0.6 ± 0.2 mN). No significant differences were noted between Emax values. However, Emax values produced by all four drugs were substantially lower than those evoked by an approximate EC50 concentration (10 nM) of the thromboxane A2 analog U 46619 (27.5 ± 3.9 mN), indicating relatively weak contractile responses induced by F 11356, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and DHE.

In isolated perfused guinea pig hearts, in the presence of endothelial dysfunction and raised coronary vascular resistance induced by nitric oxide synthase inhibition with L-NAME (10 µM), sumatriptan concentration-dependently [pD2 = 5.4 (5.2-5.5)] induced transient diastolic contracture via a mechanism not involving 5-HT1B/1D receptors (Le Grand et al., 1998b). Under identical conditions, DHE or zolmitriptan (both 32 µM) failed to evoke diastolic contracture (Le Grand et al., 1998b). Similar to DHE and zolmitriptan, a high concentration of F 11356 (32 µM) also failed to induce diastolic contracture (data not shown).

In action potentials recorded via the conventional intracellular microelectrode technique (Le Grand et al., 1995) in isolated guinea pig papillary muscles driven at 1 Hz, F 11356 (0.001-10 µM; n = 8) failed to significantly affect resting potential (-91.7 ± 1.05 versus -91.4 ± 0.6 mV), action potential amplitude (127.0 ± 1.5 versus 127.4 ± 1.4 mV), maximal upstroke velocity (155.2 ± 9.4 versus 147.9 ± 8.1 V/s), or action potential duration at 90% repolarization (208.2 ± 6.0 versus 208.8 ± 4.0 ms), indicating that on the basis of these data, F 11356 appears to be devoid of arrhythmogenic potential.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

F 11356 is a novel arylpiperazide 5-HT derivative that has been designed to take advantage of the superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT compared with tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors. Indeed, the most striking feature of the pharmacological profile of F 11356, besides high potency and selectivity, is the uniquely high level of intrinsic activity exerted by the compound at 5-HT1B/1D receptors.

Radioligand Binding and Cellular Assays. F 11356 has subnanomolar affinity for recombinant human and nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, does not distinguish between the two subtypes, and displays high selectivity over other 5-HT-binding sites, including 5-HT1F sites. F 11356 has low or no detectable affinity for a number of major neurotransmitter, autacoid, ion channel, or reuptake binding sites (unpublished observations). Moderate (submicromolar) affinity was shown for F 11356 at 5-HT1A receptors, and the intact cell cAMP assay yielded similarly weak 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity for F 11356. The radioligand-binding profile of F 11356 is one of a high-affinity, high-selectivity 5-HT1B/1D receptor ligand.

F 11356 was the most potent inhibitor of cAMP accumulation in C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D receptors, although zolmitriptan was equipotent to F 11356 at h 5-HT1D receptors. Similarly, F 11356 was also more potent than tryptamine and its derivatives, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan, in enhancing specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding in C6 glioma cell membranes expressing h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors. DHE was equipotent to F 11356 in enhancing specific [35S]GTPgamma S binding in both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D systems. A striking finding in the latter study was the apparent difference in maximal responses obtained with F 11356 compared with the tryptamine derivatives and DHE. Agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgamma S binding is a measure of receptor-coupled G protein activation and thus of agonist intrinsic activity (Pauwels et al., 1997, 1998b). F 11356 produced a similar maximal enhancement of [35S]GTPgamma S binding to 5-HT in both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptor systems, which was superior to that obtained with the tryptamine derivatives examined and DHE, with the exception of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan at h 5-HT1B receptors. The high-efficacy properties of F 11356 at these receptors also contribute to the high potency of the compound. These data indicate that F 11356 behaves as a potent, high-efficacy agonist at h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors, in a similar manner to the endogenous agonist 5-HT.

In Vitro Activity in Vascular and Neuronal Models. 5-HT1B receptors have been shown to mediate vasoconstriction (Hamel et al., 1993; Valentin et al., 1996), and any involvement of 5-HT1D receptors in mediating vasoconstriction has not been thus far demonstrated. The isolated rabbit saphenous vein is a well established preparation in which potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists have been determined (Martin and MacLennan, 1990). F 11356 induced 5-HT1B receptor-mediated contractions of isolated rabbit saphenous vein rings with a similar potency and maximal response as those of 5-HT. Naratriptan, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan were less potent than F 11356. Although naratriptan produced equivalent maximum responses to F 11356 and 5-HT, those generated by rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan were of greater magnitude. As shown for sumatriptan (Valentin et al., 1996), a component of the contractile responses evoked by rizatriptan and zolmitriptan is dependent on an intact endothelium, suggesting the release of an endothelium-derived contraction factor (Valentin et al., 1996). However, this does not appear to apply to F 11356 or naratriptan because both produced equivalent maximum responses to 5-HT. In agreement with this finding, no significant differences in maximum responses were noted between F 11356, 5-HT, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, and naratriptan in the absence of endothelium (unpublished observations). Sensitivity of contractile responses evoked by F 11356 to the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (Clitherow et al., 1994) supports the involvement of 5-HT1B receptors in mediating these responses, as described previously for 5-HT, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, and sumatriptan (Valentin et al., 1996). The greater potency of F 11356 and 5-HT compared with that of the tryptamine derivatives investigated is also due in part to the high-efficacy characteristics of the former two compounds at the saphenous vein 5-HT1B receptor. These data provide further confirmation of the superior potency of F 11356 at 5-HT1B receptors compared with the tryptamine derivatives investigated and similar potency of F 11356 as that of 5-HT. These data also demonstrate that F 11356 is active at the vascular level, which is in line with the vascular hypothesis of migraine (Ferrari and Saxena, 1993).

Recent studies have identified an inhibitory action of 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists on trigeminal neuronal firing (Hoskin et al., 1996) as a potentially important mechanism of therapeutic migraine abortive activity. These actions are mediated by 5-HT1B/1D receptors (Goadsby and Knight, 1997). Predominantly 5-HT1D mRNA has been detected in human and guinea pig trigeminal ganglia (Rebeck et al., 1994; Bouchelet et al., 1996). In isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion neurons, outward K+ currents involved in regulating excitability (Sah, 1996) were increased by both sumatriptan and F 11356 in a GR 127935-sensitive manner. However, as observed in the rabbit saphenous vein, F 11356 was more potent and, more importantly, produced a greater magnitude of response compared with sumatriptan. Responses evoked by F 11356 were abolished by the calcium chelator EGTA, indicating Ca2+ dependence of K+ current activation and suggesting that F 11356 hyperpolarizes trigeminal ganglion neurons by increasing an outward Ca2+-dependent K+ current after activation of 5-HT1B/1D receptors. However, we have no evidence to indicate whether the receptors involved are 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, or both. A similar activation of Ca2+-dependent K+ current has been reported for sumatriptan in C6 glioma cells stably expressing either recombinant h 5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D receptors (Le Grand et al., 1998a), indicating that both receptors may be coupled to Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. In addition to confirming high-potency and high-efficacy characteristics of F 11356 at neuronal 5-HT1B/1D receptors, the data point to a key mechanism by which F 11356 could reduce trigeminal neuronal firing and sensory neuropeptide release, which is in line with the neurogenic hypothesis of migraine (Moskowitz, 1992). Moreover, the present data strongly suggest that trigeminal ganglion neurons could represent another key site of action for 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, in addition to the peripheral sensory nerve-vessel interface and central trigeminal nucleus caudalis. This is in contrast to a previous report (O'Shaughnessy et al., 1993) in which sumatriptan failed to affect macroscopic tissue potentials that were recorded in guinea pig trigeminal ganglia using an extracellular electrode.

F 11356 thus behaves as a high-potency, high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist in both vascular and neuronal tissues that constitutively express these receptors. Interestingly, the potency of F 11356 was similar in saphenous vein and trigeminal ganglion neurons (pD2 = 7.1 and 7.3, respectively), but these values are around 2 log units lower than the affinity and potency values reported in recombinant 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor systems. The same appears to be the case for sumatriptan and the other tryptamine derivatives investigated. This could be explained parsimoniously by major differences in receptor expression levels between transfected systems (high) and native systems (low), although further studies are warranted to clarify this issue.

In Vivo Pharmacological Profile of F 11356. 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists elicit vasoconstriction in the carotid vascular bed of dogs (Feniuk et al., 1989) and pigs (Den Boer et al., 1991). This pharmacological activity is considered to be of importance in the migraine abortive effects of 5-HT1B/1D (previously 5-HT1-like) receptor agonists (Feniuk et al., 1989; Den Boer et al., 1991; De Vries et al., 1996) and is a key element of the vascular hypothesis (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991; Ferrari and Saxena, 1993). In anesthetized pigs, F 11356 elicited carotid vasoconstriction in a highly selective manner with respect to systemic arterial pressure or coronary vascular resistance. F 11356 was more than 10 times more potent than naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, or zolmitriptan in reducing carotid blood flow and consistently produced greater maximum responses. Dose dependence of carotid vasoconstriction elicited by sumatriptan and naratriptan had a bell-shaped aspect suggestive of low agonist efficacy; and activation of other mechanisms at higher doses to explain the downturn phase of the dose-response curve can be excluded because sumatriptan-induced carotid vasoconstriction is mediated exclusively by 5-HT1B/1D receptors (De Vries et al., 1996).

Naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan thus displayed moderate carotid vascular selectivity, which is consistent with low intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B/1D receptors. Furthermore, selective carotid vasoconstriction produced by F 11356 was long lasting, remaining at near-maximal values 1 h after the drug infusion was stopped. In contrast, carotid vasoconstriction evoked by naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan was relatively brief, having returned to near baseline values 1 h after drug infusion was stopped. These data suggest that F 11356 has a longer duration of action at 5-HT1B/1D receptors in vivo than the tryptamine derivatives investigated. F 11356-induced carotid vasoconstriction was abolished by GR 127935, suggesting exclusive mediation by 5-HT1B/1D receptors, which is in agreement with its in vitro receptor selectivity profile. GR 127935 per se also produced weak carotid vasoconstriction, which is in agreement with previous reports of intrinsic activity of the compound at 5-HT1B/1D receptors (Pauwels and Colpaert, 1995; De Vries et al., 1996). These data demonstrate superior potency, intrinsic activity, and in vivo selectivity of F 11356 at carotid arterial 5-HT1B/1D receptors compared with naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan. By virtue of the greater efficacy of F 11356 in producing 5-HT1B/1D receptor-mediated carotid vasoconstriction, the craniovascular selectivity of the drug, with respect to coronary and systemic vasoconstriction, is superior to that of the tryptamine derivatives investigated.

Orally administered F 11356 dose dependently (from 0.63 mg/kg) and significantly decreased unilateral carotid blood flow in conscious dogs without significantly affecting heart rate or behavior. The decreases in carotid blood flow produced by F 11356 were long lasting, which is in agreement with those observed in anesthetized pigs. These data indicate that F 11356 is orally active and that the drug is well tolerated. The decreases in carotid blood flow observed with F 11356 in anesthetized pigs and conscious dogs are in agreement with the high-potency, -selectivity, and -efficacy characteristics at 5-HT1B/1D receptors observed in vitro. High intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B/1D receptors is therefore likely to be necessary for detectable changes in carotid blood flow to occur in the conscious animal because carotid blood flow is lower than that in anesthetized pigs or dogs (De Vries et al., 1996) and because baroreflex compensatory control is operational.

Decreases in carotid blood flow were not observed with sumatriptan, naratriptan, or zolmitriptan. Two reasons may be invoked to explain this. First, each of these drugs produced marked clinical signs, indicating that oral absorption was likely to have occurred. Higher doses of these drugs (i.e., from 0.63 mg/kg naratriptan and zolmitriptan and from 2.5 mg/kg sumatriptan) tended to produce tachycardia, which could offset or mask any detectable changes in carotid flow. Second, the intrinsic activity of the latter three drugs at 5-HT1B/1D receptors might have been insufficient to produce decreases in carotid blood flow and to overcome compensatory reflex control.

The powerful and selective carotid vasoconstrictor action of F 11356 thus is in line with the vascular hypothesis (Den Boer et al., 1991; Ferrari and Saxena, 1993) in which constriction of cranial vessels is considered to attenuate migraine-induced vasodilatation (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991).

Access to the central nervous system is claimed to contribute to the therapeutic antimigraine effects of 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists (Goadsby and Edvinsson, 1994) by reducing the excitability of central trigeminal neurons and thus nociception, of which the second-order neurons reside in the brain stem trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Hoskin et al., 1996). In this perspective, the guinea pig hypothermia model is useful because only 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists that penetrate the blood-brain barrier elicit an hypothermic response by activating central 5-HT1B receptors (Skingle et al., 1994; Hagan et al., 1997). F 11356 dose dependently produced hypothermic responses in guinea pigs after oral administration, at doses similar to those that evoked decreases in carotid blood flow in dogs. Sumatriptan and DHE showed little or no activity, after either oral or i.p. administration, which is suggestive of poor access to the central nervous system and in agreement with previous reports (Humphrey et al., 1991; Tfelt-Hansen and Lipton, 1993). These data strongly suggest that F 11356 gains access to the central nervous system after oral administration.

In Vivo Receptor Selectivity. F 11356 failed to produce behavioral effects in rats, even at a relatively high dose (40 mg/kg), indicating that receptor selectivity of F 11356 for 5-HT1B/1D receptors versus 5-HT1A receptors is maintained in vivo.

Further Cardiovascular Studies. Data obtained in vitro with F 11356 in canine coronary artery rings revealed that the compound produced equivalent, low-amplitude maximal responses to sumatriptan, naratriptan, and DHE and was more potent than sumatriptan but less potent than naratriptan and DHE. In view of the high-efficacy properties of F 11356 compared with the other compounds investigated, greater maximal responses might have been expected but were not observed, which is in accord with the absence of changes in coronary vascular resistance in anesthetized pigs and the high degree of craniovascular selectivity exhibited by F 11356 in vivo described earlier. We have no obvious explanation as to why F 11356 behaves in a similar fashion to the tryptamine derivatives studied and DHE in producing weak coronary vasoconstriction. One possible reason is that 5-HT1B receptor-effector coupling in this tissue can produce only limited contractile responses, even on maximal activation. Although relatively weak contractile responses evoked by 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists in isolated coronary arteries have been shown by others (Connor et al., 1997; Maassen Van Den Brink et al., 1998; Valentin et al., 1998), further studies are required to address this important issue.

In isolated perfused guinea pig hearts with coronary vascular tone raised after nitric oxide synthase inhibition to induce endothelial dysfunction, a high concentration of F 11356 (32 µM) was without effect on coronary vascular resistance or left ventricular contractility. Under similar conditions, lower concentrations of sumatriptan (pD2 = 5.4) produced left ventricular diastolic (ischemic-type) contracture that did not affect coronary vascular resistance and was not 5-HT1B/1D receptor mediated (Le Grand et al., 1998b).

In isolated guinea pig papillary muscles, F 11356 failed to significantly affect any of the action potential parameters recorded, suggesting that the drug appears to be devoid of arrhythmogenic potential.

Conclusion. In summary, F 11356 is a novel arylpiperazide 5-HT derivative; is a selective, high-potency agonist at 5-HT1B/1D receptors; and distinguishes itself from tryptamine and derivatives and DHE in exerting exceptional intrinsic activity at these receptors in models relevant to the vascular and neurogenic hypotheses of migraine. By virtue of its high-efficacy properties at 5-HT1B/1D receptors, F 11356 displays hitherto unobserved high levels of craniovascular selectivity in vivo with respect to coronary and systemic vasoconstriction. Despite high intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B receptors, the amplitude of canine coronary vasoconstriction evoked by F 11356 was not greater than that observed with sumatriptan, naratriptan, or DHE. The level of intrinsic activity of F 11356 obtained at 5-HT1B/1D receptors is comparable to that of the endogenous agonist 5-HT. The selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists derived from tryptamine that have been described thus far, including sumatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and eletriptan, behave as partial agonists (i.e., have low agonist efficacy at these receptors with respect to 5-HT; Connor et al., 1997; Martin et al., 1997; Pauwels et al., 1997; Willems et al., 1998), which might limit their oral clinical antimigraine effectiveness (Ferrari, 1998; Goadsby, 1998a, b). Clinical studies with a high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, of which F 11356 is the first, are therefore justified to verify the hypothesis that the magnitude of intrinsic activity at these receptors is a key determinant of therapeutic antimigraine effectiveness. F 11356 is orally active, gains access to the central nervous system, has a long duration of action, and is well tolerated. As a putative antimigraine drug, F 11356 may exert high-efficacy agonist activity throughout the entire trigeminovascular system in which 5-HT1B/1D receptors are located: at its peripheral sensory nerve-vessel interface and the ganglion and central (brain stem) levels. Thus, F 11356 has the potential to exert greater therapeutic antimigraine activity than other, currently available treatments.

    Acknowledgments

We are grateful to our colleagues in the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases II, Neurobiology I and II, and Medicinal Chemistry IV and the Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology for excellent technical assistance; to Drs. J. P. Ribet, J. L. Maurel, and C. Jorand-Lebrun for the synthesis of reference compounds; to G. Guerin and S. Cecco for excellent secretarial assistance; and to Dr. J. M. Guillon for critical comments and help with the figures.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 4, 1999.

Received for publication December 14, 1998.

1 Part of this work was presented at the IUPHAR meeting held in München, Germany, July 1998, and has been published in abstract form (John et al., 1998a, b; Pauwels et al., 1998a).

Send reprint requests to: Dr. G. W. John, Centre de Recherche Pierre FABRE, 17 Ave. Jean Moulin, 81106 Castres Cedex, France. E-mail: gareth.john{at}pierre-fabre.com

    Abbreviations

5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin); DHE, dihydroergotamine; F 11356, 4-[4-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-1H-indol-5-yloxyl]acetyl]piperazinyl-1-yl]benzonitrile HCl; GTPgamma S, guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate; GR 127935, 2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl[1,2,4]oxadiozol-3-yl)biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl piperazin-1-yl)phenyl]amide 2 HCl; cAMP, cyclic AMP; L-NAME, Nomega -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; U 46619, 9,11-dideoxy-9alpha ,11alpha -methanoepoxy PGF2alpha .

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References